Abstracts of Presentations
According to Stephens and Kadijevich (2020), Computational Thinking (CT) consists of the four components, decomposition, abstraction, algorithmisation, and automation. Further, they stated that Algorithmic Thinking (AT) consists of decomposition,
abstraction, and algorithmisation. AT is one form of mathematical reasoning, required whenever one has to comprehend, test, improve, or design an algorithm. Mathematicians have done this long before the electronic computer. Putting the two descriptions
together, we have that CT is thus “AT with a computer”.
At the International Congress of Mathematics Education held in July in Sydney (ICME-15), I co-chaired the Topic Study Group 1.9: Teaching and Learning of Computational Thinking. The talks were divided into four areas: Theory, Curriculum,
Teaching and Learning, and Teacher Education. In this talk, I will summarise the main areas of CT research and development that were presented and from these, recommend what I consider viable and fruitful directions for CT research and development
in Singapore.
Reference:
Stephens, M., & Kadijevich, D. M. (2020). Computational/Algorithmic Thinking. In Lerman, S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 117–123). Springer.
Promoting Metacognition and Engagement in Vocational Students
This planned study explores the promotion of metacognition and engagement among vocational students enrolled in the Institute of Technical Education (ITE), specifically second-year students in the Higher Nitec in Business Information Systems programme, aged 17 to 19. This study proposed a mixed-method approach, and infuses an intervention programme into the practical labsheets of the "Networking Technology" course. The infused intervention will be applied to one of two intact classes, while the other class will serve as a comparison group. The primary aim of this study is to assess whether there is a significant difference in metacognition and engagement levels between the intervention and comparison classes following the infused intervention. Additionally, the study seeks to capture students’ perceived impact of the intervention on their learning process. Findings from this study could offer valuable insights into promoting metacognition and student engagement within vocational education.
An exemplification of the mathematics register Knowledge Quartet through three tasks
Language has increasingly been discussed in terms of its role as an important resource in mathematics education research. Similarly, teachers have often been encouraged to use proper mathematical language in their classrooms. However, not many researchers focus on understanding the specific knowledge teachers have in relation to language (in particular, the mathematics register) and how they attend to language in the mathematics classroom. In this presentation, I attempt to exemplify teachers’ knowledge in this aspect through the four dimensions of an adapted version of the Knowledge Quartet, which focuses on the mathematics register as the key aspect of knowledge being analyzed and discussed. Eleven experienced mathematics teachers were interviewed and asked to reflect upon what they noticed and how they would respond to three tasks, designed to illustrate situations which might lead to language-related dilemmas and challenges in using the mathematics register. Their responses were used to exemplify their knowledge (or lack of knowledge) of the mathematics register, in relation to the four dimensions of the Mathematics Register Knowledge Quartet, thus providing insights into how language might be attended to in the teaching and learning of related concepts.
A student’s interplay of cognitive and metacognitive processes when solving word problems: an exploratory study
Studies on mathematical problem solving have suggested that both cognitive and metacognitive processes are crucial for problem solving. Newman (1983) had identified five cognitive processes, which come into play when students are solving word problems, namely reading, comprehending, transforming, processing, and encoding. Wilson and Clarke (2004) referred to metacognitive processes as the awareness of one’s own thinking, evaluation, and regulation of that thinking. Although it is clear that solving a problem involves a complex process, characterised by a continual alternation between cognitive and metacognitive processes, how these two processes work together remains unclear. In this presentation, I examined this interplay of cognitive and metacognitive processes of a high-achieving student as she attempted to solve a challenging word problem. The student was asked to think aloud as she solved an arithmetic word problem and introspective and retrospective interviews were conducted to capture as many thought processes as possible throughout the problem-solving process. The data collected and analysed consisted of the audio and video records of the student’s think-aloud problem-solving attempts, fieldnotes, and the student’s written work. The student’s verbalisations were transcribed and analysed in terms of the cognitive and metacognitive processes to understand how the two processes work together—the interplay of these two processes. I will report on my initial findings and highlight some possible insights and implications for future research and teaching practice.
Development of Items to Assess Big Ideas of Equivalence and Proportionality
It is well known that Side-Side-Angle is not a triangle congruency test. We call a triangle ∆ABC an SSA-triangle if for any tringle ∆DEF, ∆ABC is congruent to ∆DEF whenever AB = DE, BC=EF and m∠C= m∠F. We first show a necessary and sufficient condition for SSA-triangles. Then we demonstrate some results in topology, real analysis and domain theory, which have arisen from similar types of problems in the respective areas.
Rapid and non-destructive classification of seed varieties is one of the important goals pursued by modern seed industry. Due to the large number of maize varieties in practice, collecting training samples that exhaust all varieties to train a classifier is extremely difficult. Therefore, maize seed classification in the real world faces the challenge of variety renewal and rejection of unknown varieties. In this talk, an end-to-end trainable incremental learning (IL) framework based on hypercube data is presented. This method achieves class-IL via learning one-class classifier (OCC) incrementally, and directly uses raw data as input without additional data preprocessing and feature extraction. The OCC is a dual deep support vector data description, which makes full use of spectral and spatial information to establish an exclusive hypersphere for a specific variety to receive the variety and reject unknown varieties. To remove the interference of redundant bands, a band attention and sparse constraint module is added to automatically assign the weights of redundant bands to zero, thereby maximally improving the performance of the model. Moreover, a new loss function is defined to alleviate the difficulty of parameter updating after sparse constraint. Experimental results on our open set indicate that the accuracy of the proposed method for receiving known varieties and rejecting unknown varieties are both above 91 %, which has significant advantages over the other state-of-the-art IL methods. In the future, the corresponding OCCs can also be deleted from the whole framework according to the varieties eliminated by the government to reduce computational overhead and inter-class interference. Overall, the proposed method can perform both IL and open set recognition.
An edge-colored graph is called rainbow if all the colors on its edges are distinct. A rainbow copy of a graph H in an edge-colored graph G is a subgraph of G isomorphic to H such that the edge-coloring restricted to H is rainbow. For any two graphs G and H, the anti-Ramsey number, denoted by Ar(G, H), is the maximum number of colors in an edge-coloring of G which has no rainbow copy of H. For n≥3, the n-prism is the cartesian product Cn K2. In this talk, I will introduce a result determining the anti-Ramsey numbers for cycles in n-prisms.